Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

See how 'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' looks during a on-stage rehearsal

Screen_shot_2016-04-22_at_2.02.17_pm

In less than 50 days, Harry Potter makes his first foray from page and screen to stage, inHarry Potter and the Cursed Child, the two-part play set to open in London. As the cast begins rehearsing everything from duels to diction, J.K. Rowling visited the theater to see how her magical story lives on.
A video taken during the April 18 rehearsal features the cast of children and adults rehearsing blocking and wand choreography. 
"One of the things that I have valued most about the Potter fandom is that as a community they have really looked after each other," said Rowling. "People have each other's backs, it's a special thing."
The production trio are self-admittedly nervous about previews and a premiere, but optimistic about the learning process.
"What works here [in rehearsal] might not necessarily work on the stage in the same way, and might require quite big chances in order to make it function in a really powerful way," Thorne said.
"This will be such an incredible theatrical experience that I'd love us to be able to surprise people and move people, in the natural way that a story should surprise and move people," Rowling added.

Twitter insider: Calm down, your feed isn't about to be taken over by robots

Twrr098adf
The Twitter community went into a virtual hyperventilating freakout on Friday when reports surfaced that the company might be planning on changing the way tweets are displayed (from reverse chronological to algorithmic).
But if one major, frequently outspoken Twitter activist investor is to be believed, there's nothing to worry about.
SEE ALSO: Death of Twitter is trending on Twitter as users freak out over algorithm
Early Twitter investor Chris Sacca, who claims he has no inside information, took to the messaging platform to say that there is "zero percent chance Twitter eliminates the chronological feed."
Sacca was also careful to add that he doesn't work at the company. However, those familiar with his tweets, which sometimes presage major moves at Twitter, are likely to take Sacca's word as a relatively authoritative source on the topic.
Although it's not unusual for Sacca to speak out publicly on all things Twitter, it's particularly understandable that he'd carve out a couple of minutes on a Saturday to address the issue considering Friday's backlash.
Once reports began surfacing that Twitter might change the way tweets are read to an algorithmic system, like Facebook's, the outrage on Twitter was swift and passionate.
So many users, high profile and devoted fans alike, spoke out against the change that a new hashtag is now trending worldwide: #RIPTwitter.
But those concerns may be premature.
In a related mini-tweet storm, Twitter iOS engineer Brandon Carpenter responded to the rumor-fueled backlash by attempting to calm everyone's nerves.
Unfortunately for Carpenter, Twitter users weren't in the mood to be talked down from the social media ledge, and quickly descended upon him with a raft of unflattering tweets responding to his original message.
The experience appears to have opened Carpenter's eyes a bit more to the oft-mentioned problem of harassment on Twitter. But mean tweets aside, what Sacca's and Carpenter's Twitter messages add up to is that 1. no matter how many times someone tells you Twitter is on the decline, it still has a passionate user base that cares about its future and 2. those rumors about algorithmic changes may have just been rumors. Or not. 
Either way, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey is now on notice from his users: If you are toying with algorithms on the Twitter timeline, don't expect a long list of favorites to come your way. The tweeple have already spoken.

People in Japan are squishing their babies' faces to look like rice balls

Z-1
We've been squeezing babies' cute faces since the beginning of time. But now, we're not just talking about pinching cheeks.
#RiceBallBabies, which has become a hugely popular meme in Japan, is inspiring people to squish their babies' faces into a shape that resembles a rice ball — by placing their thumbs under a baby's chin and framing their cheeks. Except, of course, these babies are way cuter than regular rice balls that you eat.
SEE ALSO: The Internet can't get enough of this girl dancing seductively with food
We'll show you. Here are some rice balls:
And here is a rice ball baby:Embedded image permalink
The meme can be traced back to Japanese comedian Masahiro Ehara, who squished his kids' faces into rice ball shapes in June, to the delight of Twitter.Embedded image permalinkEmbedded image permalink
Now everyone wants to post their own #RiceBallBabies — and maybe a rice ball pet, too.Embedded image permalinkEmbedded image permalink
Oh, Internet, thou art a land of wonders.

Twitter launches discounts linked to your credit card

Twitter_credit
Your Twitter addiction might save you some money starting Tuesday.
The company has launched Twitter Offers, which lets marketers run promotions that you can redeem via your credit card. If a Twitter Offer pops up in your timeline, now you can add the Offer to your credit card or debit card. When you click to buy the item, the discount will be applied, though the cash back won't show up for a few days.
As with Twitter's Buy button, to redeem the offer, users have to click on it. Then they'll be directed to a landing page where they can enter their credit- or debit card info.
Once you enter your card information, Twitter has it on hand so you can redeem future offers without that hassle. (Having your data also helps Twitter push its "Buy" button.)
For advertisers, Twitter Offers presents a way to track ROI for Twitter-based promotions. If 50 people redeem an Offer, for instance, they can work out how much they spent for each redemption.
The company says it is planning to work with a "handful" of unnamed brands for Twitter Offers this holiday season.
twitter offers

The Year in Facebook: Moving Fast, Breaking Less

Mark-zuckerberg-smilesIf there's one thing Facebook generates, besides selfies and baby pics, it's lots and lots of press.
The company has more than one billion users, one of tech's most recognizable CEOs (still only 29!), and enormous stores of your personal data. Like it or not, we all seem to have a stake, whether big or small, in what happens at Facebook's Menlo Park, Calif., headquarters. It makes sense, then, that the social network keeps us all, reporters and readers alike, busy week in and week out.
The company has a reputation for changing its product regularly, and this year was no different. Facebook's 2013 activities ran the gamut from the good (Graph Search), to the bad (Facebook Home), and, of course, the ugly (its misuse of an extremely sensitive image in an ad).
On the business side of things, Facebook stock experienced a resurgence as it collected a number of noteworthy headlines, including the company's first ever Fortune 500 Ranking (#482) and its one millionth advertiser.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg outlined his vision for bringing Internet access to all corners of the globe in 2013, a pledge that could bring great opportunity to the masses — and a few more billion users to Facebook.
The company's motto remains "Move fast and break things," and Facebook seems to be breaking things with less frequency, while moving faster than ever. Here's a look back at the top Facebook headlines that kept us captivated over the past 12 months.

Tangling With the NSA

Facebook found itself in the middle of the year's top tech crisis when reports surfaced in Junethat companies like Facebook, Apple and Google were granting government access to private user data. Facebook denied the reports (along with all the other companies mentioned), but the NSA surveillance program, known as PRISM, dominated the headlines for many weeks following the initial allegations.
Following the revelations, it was Facebook's turn to share information. Less than two weeks after the original PRISM stories ran in the Washington Post and The Guardian, Facebook released its own report, claiming the company receives nearly 1,500 requests for user data per month.
An NSA protest takes place in Berlin.

In August, Facebook released its first ever Transparency Report, documenting the number of users included in information requests. (Facebook, along with other tech companies like Google and Microsoft, publicly asked the government for permission to provide even more details.)
In an interview with The Atlantic in September, Zuckerberg shared that the NSA's report affected users' trust in Facebook. "There's a lot of times where ... someone will criticize us in the press over privacy. What we've found is that stuff tends to not actually move the needle that much on the brand perception around trust," he said. "The NSA stuff did."

Facebook's Teen Problem?

It was a story line that took center stage during the company's latest earnings call at the end of October — is Facebook losing out on teen users? The stock dropped dramatically after CFO David Ebersman hinted that there might be a slight issue retaining younger teens on the platform. "Youth usage among U.S. teens was stable overall from Q2 to Q3, but we did see a decrease in daily users partly among younger teens," Ebersman said. And based on anecdotal evidence, it appears the conversation is one that teens themselves are struggling with.
The stock market reacted, erasing a 15% gain the stock was riding in after hours trading. (Some believe the stock drop was a result of Facebook saying it wouldn't increase the number of ads on the platform moving forward; in reality, both comments most likely caused the dip.) Either way, Facebook's mention of teen use declining, even within a small subset of "younger teens," coupled with Facebook's reported failed bid for Snapchat, doesn't scream confidence that teen users are using the site as much as they once did.
The moral of the story: It's something to pay attention to, says Brian Blau, research director for consumer technology at Gartner. "It's a serious issue and it's a long-term issue," he says. "If we do actually find out that there is a big gap there, a gap in usage, I'm guessing that Facebook will have some kind of answer for that. You can probably guess that if they're going to admit that there's a problem, then they're going to have a solution."

Home (Not So) Sweet Home

It's hard to believe Facebook Home was just unveiled in April, mostly because few people still talk about it. Facebook Home, which came pre-loaded on the HTC First (earning it the nickname "Facebook Phone"), works with Android smartphones to bring Facebook updates and features directly to the phone's home screen.
Some features of Home (like Chat Heads) have been a success, and were incorporated into later versions of the mobile app. Overall, however, Facebook Home received negative reviews, and rumors even circled that the HTC First, the phone that came with Home preloaded, has been discontinued. (An HTC spokesperson denied the allegation in September, but the phone's price dropped to just $0.99 in May.)
Facebook Home has been an abysmal failure," Blau toldMashable in September. "Maybe they had some really great ideas there, but they just didn't deliver it in the right package or the right way."

Graph Search Is Born

Graph Search rolled out in January, and may turn out to be Facebook's most interesting feature in 2014. There is a preponderance of personal user data on Facebook, and Graph Search is the first tool that really comes close to letting users harvest that information for personal use. It's a search engine within Facebook, and the smarter Graph Search becomes, the more benefit users will get from engaging with it.
A serious down side of Graph Search is that it's not yet on available on mobile. Seeking nearby restaurants that your Facebook friends Like is helpful, but less so when you need to be sitting down in front of a desktop or laptop to utilize the search function.

$FB Success

Facebook's IPO did not go as planned in 2012. In fact, it was rather disastrous. But that narrative is well in the rearview mirror, and those who hung on through the company's tumultuous first months on Wall Street are now reaping the benefits.
After closing on Dec. 31 last year at $26.62 a share, Facebook stock has nearly doubled, closing at $TKTK on TKTK. The company has a market cap north of $133 billion (more than four times that of Twitter), and more importantly, revenues continue to climb quarter after quarter. Facebook was listed on the Fortune 500 list for the first time this year at #482 and it should climb close to 100 places next year based on expected 2013 revenues compared to last year's list.

A Second-Screen Battle

There's a battle raging between Facebook and Twitter, and it's happening in front of your TV. The two companies are competing heavily to provide users with the best platform to discuss live television, a phenomenon known as the "second screen." When you watch The Voice or the Super Bowl, Facebook and Twitter want you talking about what you watch online, on their respective network, and that means having your phone or tablet handy to continue the conversation in the virtual world.
Facebook partnered with Fox Sports in September to bring user polls and comments to professional football and soccer broadcasts (Twitter has a similar partnership with ESPN). Facebook also sends weekly reports to major TV studios like ABC, NBC and CBS to fill them in on which shows are generating the most conversations online, data that should help with advertising revenue and show promotions.
It's an important area of focus for Facebook. Discussions around live television bring more users to the platform by giving them a reason to log in, but they also give advertisers confirmation that Facebook is a place to go for reaching an engaged audience. If users are spending the commercial break scrolling through News Feed, advertisers will want to be there — a fact that is not lost on Facebook.

Mobile Growth

Facebook is vocal about being a "mobile-first" company, and in 2013 it proved the words are more than just a Silicon Valley cliché. The company reported $882 million in mobile ad revenue last quarter, nearly six times as much as Q3 2012, and mobile ads now generate 49% of Facebook's revenue total.
Facebook also added over 250 monthly mobile active users in the past year, and that number should continue to grow in 2014. Facebook was the only social networking app in the Top 10 most-downloaded list from the App Store on both iPhone and iPad this year.
A graph depicting Facebook's mobile users as of Q3 2013.
 Source: Facebook Q3 Earnings Report

The Rise of Instagram

Instagram's year was bigger than Facebook's in terms of major rollouts. The photo-sharing app, which Facebook purchased last year for $1 billionadded videos to the service in June,messaging to the service in December, and finally started monetizing with its first set of in-feed ads.
Instagram announced 150 million monthly active users in September, a significant milestone considering the app had 100 million actives in February of 2013. Facebook likely won't admit it (see the teen problem segment above), but it appears that Instagram is the company's biggest weapon against the rising popularity of Snapchat, the photo-sharing app that deletes user photos and videos after they are viewed.
Instagram's new messaging feature, Instagram Direct, now allows private sharing between friends within the app, in many ways mirroring the functionality that Snapchat provides, although the photos do not disappear.
And while the jury is out on whether Instagram Direct will strike a chord with users, the verdict is in on the platform's advertisements — users are not happy, at least in the comments. (Wenoticed this initially when ads rolled out and, based on the comments under recent ads, it appears their rage persists.) The ads are relatively infrequent, appearing approximately once a week from what we've seen, and receive thousands of likes, but they also serve as lightning rods for thousands of angry Instagram users.

A Vanishing Snapchat Bid

Need validation that Snapchat is for real? The photo-sharing app had more total downloads for iPhone in 2013 than Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, respectively. The company claims that users send 400 million "snaps" — images or videos — per day, a number that exceeds Facebook's 350 million daily photo shares. Snapchat does not, however, share data on how many users it has in total.
So it's no surprise that Facebook showed an interest in the company this fall. The world's largest social network reportedly made a bid for the Snapchat — to the tune of $3 billion. That's $2 billionmore than Facebook paid for Instagram last year, another app that wasn't bringing in revenue when Facebook came calling.
The Snapchat guys are crazy for not selling if the rumors are true," says Michael Pachter, an analyst with Wedbush Securities. "Snapchat is a really interesting little service, but it's really hard to say that there will ever be a business model there."

Perhaps Facebook dodged a bullet; or perhaps Facebook's bid was validation that there's something legitimate to Snapchat. Either way, Facebook's addition of Instagram Direct may mean this courtship is over.

Internet.org

Zuckerberg is not the only tech figure responsible for Internet.org, but he is the most notable and outspoken. The Facebook CEO announced the initiative in August with the intention of bringing Internet access to the four-plus billion people worldwide currently without it.
Internet.org's supporting team includes Ericsson, MediaTek, Nokia, Opera, Qualcomm and Samsung, and the goals include cheaper data plans and more reliable access, particularly on mobile devices.
Some criticized Zuckerberg for being to self-interested, tackling a problem that could also drive lots of business for Facebook. In theory, if the world has more Internet users, Facebook has more potential clients.
"The unfair economic reality is that those already on Facebook have way more money than the rest of the world combined, so it may not actually be profitable for us to serve the next few billion people for a very long time, if ever," Zuckerberg wrote in the Internet.org mission statement. " 
But we believe everyone deserves to be connected."

With Zuckerberg's plan to bring the entire world online, and the speed at which the company continues to evolve, it appears Facebook won't be short of headline-grabbing developments in 2014. Or any time in the near future — provided it doesn't break anything that can't be put together again.

Twitter: What to Expect in 2014

Twitter-1-2

Seven years ago, Twitter was just a small, ragtag collection of hackers fighting over the basis premise of the company and struggling to keep the site from crashing every other day. Twitter has come a long way since then.
The company is on track to bring in more than half a billion dollars in revenue this year. It hasmore than 230 million monthly active users worldwide and some 2,300 employees in offices in San Francisco, New York, London, Dublin and Sao Paulo. It navigated a smooth IPO in November (unlike another social network that shall remain nameless) and is now valued at around $30 billion.
Twitter has grown up, but the business still needs to mature. The social network has just more than 53 million monthly active users in the U.S., significantly less than Facebook and only about a fifth of the country's total number of Internet users. Global user growth has slowed dramatically, both on a quarter-over-quarter basis and year-over-year. And while revenue is on track to nearly double this year from 2012, the company is far from profitable. It reported a net loss of $79 million in 2012 and a loss of $133.9 million in the first nine months of this year.
On the product side, Twitter recently made significant changes to the user experience on mobile and desktop, emphasizing conversations and visual content in the stream. However, those changes were quickly criticized by many of Twitter's oldest and most active users. Behind the scenes, Twitter is still painfully hesitant about approving new features and reportedly even considered killing off some of these recent changes shortly after their releases due to the negative reaction.
As Twitter begins its first full year as a public company, it will have to commit its resources to tackle these other issues — all while operating under the gaze of investors looking for Twitter to grow revenue and yes, turn a profit.

A Richer, Effortless Experience

Despite the initial uproar over Twitter's redesign, the social network will likely only become more visual and interactive in the coming year. That means more prominence for pictures, articles, TV clips, ecommerce features, you name it. Profile pages should expect a redesign to "highlight more useful information," and direct messages — once a buried feature on the service — are becoming prominent and more visual thanks to a new option to send images.
These changes are intended to kill two birds — no pun intended, Twitter — with one stone: provide a more visual (valuable)platform for advertisers and boost user numbers and engagement. Just a few months ago, brand posts on Twitter were essentially just chunks of text with links or small images; now they look like full-fledged banner ads. Likewise, the Twitter feed increasingly resembles the News Feed on Facebook, which may help lower the bar for entry for users who are familiar with Facebook but still confused by Twitter."I definitely think we are going to see Twitter focusing on user acquisition, and develop ways to increase engagement with the existing user base and to attract new users," Clark Fredricksen, VP at eMarketer, told Mash. "Whether through partnerships with media, more engaging product enhancements like images in stream or other ways."
To that end, it's also likely Twitter will continue trying to explain exactly what Twitter is to new users. The company updated its about page to better explain how the service works; it unveiled adedicated account in November that offers a guide to the social network, though it hasn't tweeted much of late. In the same vein, Twitter introduced several new accounts, including @magicrecsand @eventparrot, which automatically notify users about people to follow or breaking news, respectively. Through such accounts, even beginners may eventually be able to get as much out of Twitter as longtime users.

Advertising Beyond Twitter's Nest

The year Facebook went public, it went on a monetization bender. The social network introducedmobile ads, sponsored posts in the News Feed, paid messages — remember that? — and prompted users to pay $7 to promote their own posts. These efforts were as obvious as they were flawed: Facebook needed to show investors its revenue potential.
Instead, Twitter's focus in the coming year will likely be expanding on two of its ad tools. The first is selling native adson other apps outside the Twitter ecosystem, thanks to the recent acquisition of MoPub, a mobile ad exchange. By moving beyond its own network, Twitter should be able to promise advertisers a broader reach than they would get otherwise. "Right now," Blau said, "Facebook ads are only on Facebook, but Twitter is moving pretty fast to break that."Twitter, on the other hand, will probably be more cautious when it comes to introducing new revenue-generating products."Facebook tends to innovate very quickly. They tend to throw spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks," said Brian Blau, a social media analyst with Gartner. "Twitter is not as experimental."

The second big push, according to Fredricksen, will be to expand its self-service ad platform to more countries in order to spur international revenue growth. "One of the ways that Google and Facebook have seen huge increases in sales, particularly in foreign markets where they don't have sales teams necessarily, has been through their self-service tools," he said.
Beyond that, some speculate that the social network might eventually roll out more video ads through Vine or Twitter — or that they may introduce some new promoted product. Given how slowly Twitter moves, however, that might take a while.

Embracing the Second Screen

The T-word was dropped more than 40 times in the company's IPO paperwork. No, not Twitter.Television.
"By enhancing the activity related to their programming or event on Twitter, media outlets can drive tune-in and awareness of their original content, leveraging Twitter’s strength as a second screen for television programming," Twitter's team wrote in the S-1, essentially highlighting its pitch to marketers. The emphasis on television shouldn't be too surprising. Marketers spend $70 billion a year on television placements; Twitter (and Facebook) want a piece of that.
In recent months, Twitter has inked partnerships with CBS, BBC, A&E and others as part of the Twitter Amplify program to promote video clips like instant replays or exclusive behind-the-scenes shots that promote shows airing on television. Twitter has also supplied data to Nielsen to track engagement around shows on the social network, and Twitter has partnered with Comcast, Time Warner Cable and others to let subscribers view TV shows and movies via tweets.
"We expect Twitter to continue to develop partnerships with the media," Fredricksen said. "Partnerships in media are core to their Amplify program and their pitch to advertisers."
Given the importance of the second screen to Twitter's business, it seems likely television content will be featured more prominently in its app and on its website. As part of its redesign in November, Twitter introduced the option to see trending TV shows in the Discover tab, but these shows appeared far down on the page. We would expect to see this area receive higher placement in the coming months.

Acquisitions, Acquisitions, Acquisitions

With all the hype and speculation, 
Much of that money will likely go toward helping Twitter continue to scale through new hires, infrastructure investments and, of course, acquisitions. It may not have the resources like Facebook or Google to bid billions of dollars on startups like Snapchat, but Blau expects to see Twitter buy up businesses in the second screen space as well as companies that focus on natural language processing and analytics.it's sometimes easy to forget the real reason companies like Twitter go public: to raise money. Twitter raised just more than $1.8 billion from its IPO, a large influx of money though much less than the $16 billion that Facebook raised in its public offering. The company also secured a $1 billion credit line shortly before the IPO.

"Twitter is going to be on an acquisition binge," Blau said, noting that Twitter had previously been on a pace of buying five or six companies a year. "I don't think their rate of acquisition is going to slow down ... I tend to think it will be slightly more weighted to the backend."

Profitable? Probably Not

Twitter is expected to generate close to $1 billion in revenue next year as its ad products continue to mature. That marks impressive growth for the company, but it doesn't mean Twitter will achieve profitability.
Multiple reports based on interviews with bankers and analysts suggest that Twitter will continue spending aggressively in 2014 to scale and compete with other major social networks. As a result, anyone waiting for Twitter to turn a profit may have to wait until 2015

Twitter Shares Soar to Record on Optimism for Mobile-Ad Growth

Twitter-2-2

Twitter Inc., the microblogging service that held its initial public offering last month, rose to a record for a third trading day amid optimism that the company has room to expand sales in digital advertising.
Twitter jumped 8.4% to $69.96 at the close in New York after rising 7.5% yesterday. The stock has surged 169% since going public at $26 on Nov. 6, giving Twitter a market value of almost $40 billion — larger than Time Warner Cable Inc., media company Viacom Inc. and retailer Target Corp.
Investors are betting San Francisco-based Twitter can attract more ad dollars, as companies seek to market their wares through wireless devices and tie-ins with television programming. As the unprofitable company’s sales growth outpaces that of competitors such as Facebook Inc.and Google Inc., the stock has “graduated to cult status,” according to Blake Harper, an analyst at Wunderlich Securities Inc. in Baltimore.
“While the company is growing revenues faster than its fastest-growing peers and we do recognize the potential for the company to capture larger portions of the mobile and TV advertising market, it appears valuation metrics are irrelevant and that investors are betting aggressively on Twitter being the next great media-technology platform,” Harper, who recommends selling the stock, wrote in a note Tuesday.
“We don’t believe the current valuation justifies the risk,” wrote Harper, whose price target for Twitter is $34. “Especially with the company having yet to report a quarter as a public company.”

Twitter Turns Ugly Over PR Person's Idiotic Tweet

JustinefbJustine Sacco was, until Friday, the top PR person for InterActiveCorp, the New York media conglomerate run by Barry Diller. IAC owns the Daily Beast, Vimeo, About.com, Match.com and Ask.com, among many others. On her now-deactivated Twitter account, Sacco called herself a "troublemaker on the side" known for her "loud laugh." Perhaps it was inevitable that this self-image would clash with her high-rolling position.
Because Sacco has made a world of trouble for herself, and as I wrote this, she didn't even know it. Before she got on a plane Friday, a tweet emerged from Sacco's account, a joke of such monumental stupidity that it was hard for many people to believe her account wasn't hacked:
Point of fact, nobody knew if Justine Sacco's account was hacked, or if she left her phone when she boarded her plane in London. But that didn't stop IAC from issuing a preemptive press statement: “This is an outrageous, offensive comment that does not reflect the views and values of IAC,” the company said. “This is a very serious matter and we are taking appropriate action.”
SEE ALSO: Wi-Fi Provider Gogo Jumps Into the Justine Sacco Saga
If that were all there was to the story, it would have briefly lit up Twitter like a Christmas tree and burned itself out with Sacco's firing. But then there was the other part of the IAC statement: "Unfortunately, the employee in question is unreachable on an international flight." You can't fire someone this senior for anything without talking to them first, and Sacco was on a very long, wi-fi-free plane journey — 11 hours, 20 minutes on British Airways.
That occasioned a tremendous schadenfreude, as users waited for 20th century transport to catch up with 21st century communications.
Here's a representative sample of the conversation, via the trending hashtag #HasJustineLandedYet:
Sacco is nearly impossible to defend. It seems she has left a trail of casual racism across social media on her various travels, making the hacking scenario unlikely, and explaining why her company rushed to denounce her — they knew it was most likely the genuine article. She certainly did herself no favors with this writer by sliming the British in a tweet during her pit stop in London earlier Friday.
Still, it was hard to ignore a disturbing feeling in the mob's response, and something creepy in the trial by social media that was going on in her absence. You could argue she did it to herself — all those pictures in the album "Too Much Swagger for White Girls (Miami '10)" are in the public part of her Facebook Timeline, after all.
Then you could also read the hateful comments recently placed all over her Instagram feed, including on pictures of her child. That's when you might realize this whole thing has gone too far.
There's a fine line between slamming Sacco for her blatant what-guys-I-was-just-kidding buffoonery, and taking an unconscionable delight in the misfortune of others while playing Big Brother on their lives. Quite apart from anything else, that sort of attention may play into the worst tendencies of someone who would write that. It grants her notoriety, maybe even a career in news channel punditry. She can pour out an apology to Barbara Walters.
When her plane lands in Cape Town, I hope not a soul tweets her picture. I hope they show a far older social response, and turn their back on her. And as for the rest of us, I hope we take the suggestion of several good souls on Twitter — if you are (rightfully) offended by what she said, channel your rage into donating to an AIDS charity.
An earlier version of this story made reference to a screenshot of a Google search for Sacco's name that included her flight details; this turned out to be fake. We regret the error.

Wi-Fi Provider Gogo Jumps Into the Justine Sacco Saga

Gogo

Inflight Wi-Fi provider Gogo has injected itself into the fracas about IAC Senior Director of Corporate Communications Justine Sacco's unfortunate tweet on Friday.
Sacco became the topic of Internet discussion Friday evening after she tweeted, "Going to Africa. Hope I don't get AIDS. Just kidding. I'm white!" Sacco, who was on a plane to Africa as the response to the tweet played out, has not responded though her account has been deleted. Gogo, which provides wireless Internet on flights, used the occasion to highlight its service:
At this writing, Gogo's tweet has been retweeted close to 1,000 times and favorted more than 600 times. A few followers of the brand questioned the tweet, however, asking among other things, if Wi-Fi was actually available on Sacco's flight and if the brand was taking advantage of the incident to indulge in real-time marketing.

'Beyonce Think Pieces' Hashtag Mocks Media's Reaction to Album

Beyonce
When big things happen, the media sometimes gets a little carried away as it tries to spin stories from the newsy yarn.
So when Beyonce dropped the surprise of a century by releasing a new album with no warning or press, the media did what it does best — started creating think pieces.
In no time at all, journalists began over-analyzing Beyonce's every lyric, nitpicking every dance move and over-thinking every costume change from her visual album, in hopes of generating stories on feminism, the Illuminati and the singer's impact on fill-in-name-of-any-topic.
But let's call a spade a spade — it's just an album (albeit spectacular). But, if anything, it was simply a genius marketing ploy on Queen B's part. But that didn't stop Twitter from mocking the stories with the hilarious hashtag that began trending Wednesday afternoon.
Check out 20 of the best think piece headlines, below.

Tweet a Selfie to See Your Smart Car Doppelganger

Smart-carSmart Car USA launched an odd promotion on Twitter: The company will dress up a car to look like you if you tweet a picture of yourself.
The campaign, which began Tuesday and ends Thursday afternoon, asks fans to tweet a selfie with the hashtag #smartwrapme. The automaker will then tweet a photo with a car "inspired by their looks."
View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter
Smart Car is no stranger to Twitter antics. The brand caught attention in June 2012 when it offered a response to a user who complained that bird poop totaled his car. Smart Car responded with an infographic making the case that it would actually take 4.5 million birds to accomplish that feat.

5 Biggest Social Media Lessons of 2013

TweetIt was a big year for social media. Twitter made its successful debut on the stock market whileFacebook recovered from its troubled IPO a year earlier. We also saw the launch of Vine, the rise of Snapchat and the acceptance of social media by the SEC, which said public companies could use these sites to disclose information.
And that was just in the United States.
In China, which has the world's biggest population of Internet users, ecommerce giant Alibaba spent $586 million for a stake in Weibo, the country's top microblogging service and a rival to Tencent's popular WeChat instant messaging app. Meanwhile, in the Ukraine, mobile phone operators were expecting a boom in data traffic as protests against the country's president wereorganized over social networking sites, similar to the Arab Spring of 2011.
All of which is to say that if 2013 showed us one thing, it's that
there's a growing global business in accumulating friends and followers.
Of course, similar to previous years, there were also social media gaffes and hacks mixed in, along with plenty of celebrity narcissism and, unfortunately, twerks. We still have a ways to go in understanding and applying social media to the business world, but there was no shortage of lessons to glean from 2013.

Social Media Can Move Markets

On April 23, the Associated Press’ Twitter account was hacked, sending a fake tweet that there were “two explosions in the White House and Barack Obama is injured.” In a matter of seconds, the Dow dropped 150 points.
Then in June, activist investor Carl Icahn joined Twitter, first using it primarily as a megaphone in his battle with Dell and later to announce his stake in companies, most notably Apple. On Aug. 13, Icahn tweeted that he had a "large position" in the iPhone maker, pushing the shares of the tech titan up about 5%.
Witnessing a single tweet swing the pendulum of markets proved that social media is every bit as valuable to day traders as it is to newsmakers.

Social Media Is Increasingly Visual

Sure, you can say a lot in 140 characters, but a picture is still worth a thousand words. In January, Twitter-owned Vine launched as a mobile service for sharing six-second looping videos. Then, in June, Facebook responded by enabling video on Instagram.
We also saw the rise of Snapchat, a service that allows users to share photos and videos without the permanency of other social networks. That’s because users control how long (one to 10 seconds) the recipients can see their "Snaps." Once the time is up, the photo or video disappears. The service has become so popular among young Internet users that Facebook reportedly recently offered to buy it for $3 billion. Snapchat declined.
And days before its IPO, Twitter launched a product update so that tweets with Twitter photos or Vine videos display a preview thumbnail. While this facelift is still in its early days, it's already made Twitter feel like a more visual and less-textual platform.

Social Media Isn’t Just for the Kids

From Warren Buffett joining Twitter to Jamie Dimon joining the LinkedIn Influencer program, 2013 showed us that global leaders are embracing social media.
Sometimes, the business impact can be unpredictable, as Rupert Murdoch's tweets have shown.

Social Media Advertising Is Growing, Evolving

During the Super Bowl, the most talked about advertisement wasn’t a coveted 30-second TV commercial, but rather a tweet. After a power outage at the Superdome prompted a 34 minute break in play, Oreo responded by tweeting "No power? No problem" and an image of an Oreo with the text "you can still dunk in the dark." The tweet generated strong press and proved a turning point in the opportunities for advertising on social media.
2013 also showed how much money could be made from social media advertising. In the third quarter, Facebook reported revenue grew 60% compared with a year earlier, with a large piece of that from mobile advertising. Around the same time, Facebook-owned Instagram announced sponsored posts would be coming to user newsfeeds in the United States.

Social Media Could Be TV’s Best Ally

In October, Nielsen Ratings released an analysis showing a correlation between live-tweeting during TV and having a larger, more engaged audience.
The data illustrated that 19 million people in the U.S. composed 263 million tweets about live TV in the second quarter of 2013.
Social TV is still in the early days but with television as the home to coveted big dollar ads and social media as the venue for audience amplification and engagement, this could be the beginning of a long and beautiful relationship.